The preparation for the oral examination
H. The Preparation for Oral
After the exams in February, I was once nearly two months off. Who is industrious, may enter sooner, to me it has so served.
first AG for Oral
In April, I met with two friends to prepare for the oral examination. Three times a week we came together for one and a half hours: Mondays
Civil Law, Public Law
Tuesdays, Thursdays
criminal law.
At each meeting held one of us a lecture on the legal field of the day and got the other two constructive (!) Criticism, then we played three times in twenty minutes oral exam, each tested once.
a) lectures
The presentations we rotated so that each in all legal areas regularly and as frequently drankam. After receiving the charges, we held the lectures in the course supplied us with jurisdiction (in NRW you get in the charge indicated which of the three major areas of law of the presentation will be kept).
The presentation cases had to prepare themselves and pick out every home. Even if (as we regularly) while still larded in the books, it is advisable to adhere even to the limited preparation time (in NRW) to 60 minutes. You have to practice not only how to hold a lecture, but also how you look at the preparation time divides correctly. Even better is, therefore, if one is already the case for the preparation and checked one another out, that the lectures be as prepared under exam conditions!
cases are suitable as lecture situations in which 2-3 facts / bases for claims, etc., 2-3 and 2-3 people issues need to be examined, eg beginner exams, including how they are published regularly in the JuS.
Note: the cases in the series "The short lecture in the first Examination "of Augsberg are my impressions after rather too short.
Those who are very courageous, can be at times to lecture also record video, and we were spared that.
b) conducted discussions
Unlike the AG before the exams this time we had narrowed the issues of not more than ZR / ER / StrafR. This was entirely appropriate, after all, we had prepared for everything before. Even if we were not all present at once (on the contrary ...), was certainly a good exercise because it can happen to a real test in the same way. And then?
During the simulated test calls can be playing well different types of accountants - ill-prepared, ill-tempered, impatient, or even that meticulous, giving an endless situation, the others must then be summarized. The latter is in fact one important exercise! The summary is already an examination! Do not underestimate how difficult it is to play back still in the first fear is the legally relevant aspects of a situation!
second Basics repeat
I also repeated once again the fundamentals . After a two month break I had in the first week of a feeling of "criminal law? what is it? I have about the can "-? This was announced but soon! Unless you know the members of the Examination know is basic repeat the only sensible way, you can do that.
third Protocols
As soon as I get the charge, I got myself out of the student council, the relevant protocols and analyzed them. My presentation case would be based in criminal law, so I weighted Criminal Law - Ö-law - civil rights in the ratio 2:1:1. I just read in criminal law by the "most important" cases of inhibitors. My ER-examiner was pleased protocol, so I limited the material to be repeated accordingly. The civil lawyer checked everything, but often Basics - voila. Finally, I had calculated it at even the incredible luck that he was considering a case that I still had recently discussed with my AG.
4th again: practice talk!
I also practiced now again increased for the talk. Necessarily seek out people who you listen to ten minutes and give you feedback! The people do not even always be in the trade, it's all only in passing during practice to ensure the accuracy of content. Essential it is important to practice how to report a case orally in style triggers - the right focus, careful language, supportive gestures, clear structure, correct timing. The talk is your business card , the first lasting impression you leave at the Examination Board. He can decide whether you up or down tested 'will! So exercise! take Unproblematic briefly present problems pretty clearly organized, free submit, major premise, definition, subsumption, result, watching this sovereign from the laundry.
Some universities - including the EMU - Incidentally, the opportunity to participate in test simulations with professors and researchers.
CONCLUSION
I added the "direct" Preparation for first Exam total joy made, that it was worth it in terms of course note as well. I wish all those who have the right to success, whatever their design, the preparation time. Dare to tailor your learning to your abilities and needs! Critically compares and selects the options available. Provides quiet around when you realize that it does not fit. Last but not least: have fun and share new knowledge on legal discourse.
0 comments:
Post a Comment