Muse- Space Dementia Free Piano Sheet

Joss Whedon's "Equality Now" speech





Thank you.
I did not know when I came here today that this would happen. I mean, I knew I would be here, I mean the part with my mother. I would like to thank Meryl Streep and all that you have spoken so eloquently about them.

I am today evening surrounded by people of extraordinary courage. I do own one or two about courage, because I once read a book in which courage and it seemed really sounds like a lot of work, so I'll just continue writing. I write ... the most creative (?) (The most Creatist thing?) I've ever done is called a "press junket" (Promo Tour?), Which is actually pretty brave, believe me, because over and over and over and over and over and over and over again the same questions get asked. I made this up to 48 interviews a day and they are not new questions.

There is a question that I get asked almost every time I was interviewed. So I thought, tonight I share with you a question and some my answers. Because when you're asked something five hundred times, you start to really think about the answer.

Okay, so now I'm going to the reporter. It will be an amazing transformation.

- So, Joss, I, the reporter knew, like, why do you always write these strong female characters.

- I think it's up to my mother. She was an incredibly inspiring, strong, cool, sexy, funny woman and this is the kind of woman with whom I have always surrounded me, my friends, especially my wife, who is not only wiser and stronger than me, but sometimes larger - but only sometimes larger - and I think it all goes back to my mother.

- So, Joss, why do you write these strong female characters?

- Because of my father. My father and my stepfather had a lot to do with it because they appreciated spirit and determination more than anything in the women with whom they were together, and they were among the few men who understand that to acknowledge one's strength does not reduce your own.

When I created Buffy, I wanted to create a female icon, but I was also because they be surrounded by men who not only have no problem with the idea of a female leader, but raised from the idea and even attracted . Feel That came from these men [father and step-father] that this man [pointing to himself], created in turn, these men [the men of the Buffyverse] designed.

- So, why do you create them, as they say, women - I mean, we are now in Europe, so it is international, I just do not know where - these strong women characters?

- because these stories give people power. I've heard from different people and even felt this way and it's not just women like this, but also men. I think that something is at a protagonist, allows men to identify with her, that something opens up, he could not express otherwise, hopes and wishes that a male role model he would feel uncomfortable expressing. So, it goes over both [gender].

- So, why do you create these strong women characters?

- Because they are hot ...

- So, these strong women

- WHY YOU ASK THE EVER? - This is about the 50th Interview a row - how can it be possible that this is an issue at all. Honestly, seriously, why have you written that? Why do not you ask a hundred other men, why NO strong female characters ? Leave

I think that what I do not, it should be mentioned, much less honored - and there are others who do it - but seriously, this question is ridiculous, stop that.

- So, why do you write these strong female characters?

- Weil. Equality. no. Concept. is.

It's not what we strive for should, it is a necessity. Equality is like gravity. We need to stand out as men and women on this earth. And the misogyny that is in every culture, not a true part is the condicio humana. There is life out of balance, and this Imbalance drawn something from the soul of every man who is confronted with it.
We need equality. about now.

- So, why do you write these strong female characters?

- Because you're still ask this question.

Do You Capitalize Lupus

learning plan

fundamental rights:

Today in the AG about freedom


Employment:

Tuesday to Thursday, six by four hours.
Tomorrow I will go to the seminary and can find there a textbook and then work through the. There is a tutorial book by Wörlen the issue on which I myself though am not sure whether it is sufficient. In addition, there is a commentary on the study of labor law, which could possibly be helpful. Maybe I go again to the same textbook collection and on loan from the corresponding books.


inheritance

Friday to Sunday, five times four hours.
have for inheritance Schlüters I checked out "Check your knowledge" and will work through that.


criminal

behalf of AG on 9 March I have to pick out a case of theft and embezzlement, which I will do tomorrow night.


Litigation

Next week begins the course Unirep ZPO I, I will attend. Two months each Monday for three hours.


Other

Next week begins the holiday retreat rate of the Unireps for which I signed. I'm very skeptical of marriage

Graduation Homemade Center Pieces

"Do not Divorce Us

. I think that marriage promises are often given without people knowing each other or even themselves very well, that they are given for reasons unspoken and dangerous search as a desire for emotional or financial security, that they are often broken as easily as they are given, and that people who actually take them seriously have endured a lot of unnecessary sorrow and pain because of it.

Still, we have the freedom to contract (party autonomy), and I agree with Alice Schwarzer, who said that while she dislikes the concept of civil marriage (for other reasons), equality demands that everybody be allowed to marry, provided both parties are consenting adults.

tablesaw further substantiated this claim in her great essey What Marriage Is , in which she maintained that one of the main ideas (if not THE idea) of marriage is to stabilize and protect a family.

The EKD actually supports this idea in its publication Mit Spannungen leben while at the same time denying homosexual couples the right to marry. I'll save the rant on that for later.

I am reiterating all this because shoeboxer4life in an open post pointed towards a video that serves to drive home this point:



source

Imagine your vows, which you faithfully made, being declared null and void!

I have an acquaintance who got divorced from her first husband decades ago. Some time ago she married another guy. Because her first marriage had been valid under Catholic law, the only way she would have been able to get her second marriage licitly blessed by her church would have been to have the first one anulled. She refused to do that because, as she said, when she made that first marriage vow she MEANT it, and she would not have someone declare that the marriage they had HAD did not exist.

She has the right to choose this. Why should not other people be allowed the same choice?