training journal, government organizations
I had planned for some time to sign up in the near future a training guide. When I compared the different offers and read some comparative discussions, I have now decided to JuS. A friend will soon recruit me.
When JuS there is a new podcast series, "letters to young lawyers" , read by the authors. So far, there are letters from
Professor Dr. Friedrich Graf von Westphalen
lawyer and notary a. D. Dr. Hc Dolf Weber
lawyer Dr. hc Heinrich Hannover
lawyer Professor Dr. Konrad judges of the Constitutional Court started Redeke
retired Professor Dr. Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem
"In early 2008 we have a new series. Letters to young lawyers, we asked lawyers known personalities experiences from her long career to pass on to you: What experiences were to decide which values endure it comes to what are really "?
I've listened yesterday and found it very interesting. The letters are each about 7 minutes long - worth spent.
This week I'm State organs, and that I read, especially the Federal Constitutional Court rulings. I have simply part of the Degenhart as "leading" picked out in his textbook on the state organization listed right judgments, that the following judgments:
KPD ban
referendum
first Broadcasting Decision
As long as I
consent of the Bundesrat
Kalkar I
Bundestag resolution
Flick committee
NATO Double-Track Decision (nuclear missile deployment)
reaction / Income Tax Law
Solange II
Kalkar II
Promotion Fund
alien suffrage I
party financing
Maastricht
Auschwitz lie
Adriatic use
circular
party concept I
overhang mandates II
Basic mandate clause
overhang substitutes
bananas
the Verification Hessen
Biblis A
glycol
Immigration Act
NPD ban process
headscarf Ludlin
housing dangerous offenders
closing
accounts of parties
Junior Professorship
ECHR rights
Conciliation Committee
tuition
course I do not read it fully, but only the guidelines and then usually only parts of the ground, rarely excerpts from the submissions of the parties.
with the judgments I will probably be finished on Saturday afternoon and then again for me the buttons I Basic Law itself before.
The ruling Communist Party to ban is crazy long, 140 A4 pages. I've only read excerpts, but it looks SUPER interesting. Among other things, the history of the Communist Party, its theoretical background, etc. pp. presented in detail. If I take occasional leisure, I read more in it.
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Thursday, January 15, 2009
Best Cruises For Couples
AG
On Monday it was my turn with the group lead. I had time to create a custom solution sketch, but read only the solution of the case book and looked up a few things. In the AG, the difference became clear to me - I was prepared for much worse than the two hours before, in which I had created in each case completely defined solutions.
The case was "laserdrome" from the casebook of Degenhart. The solution there is decent but not perfect - I made them really but only in an hour than the other two critical questions were asked.
Next time I make another independent solution map (of course, the given solution-oriented).
We had actually planned for this hour and a feedback session. As an AG member was sick, we have indeed changed shortly, which would also make it not just as a trio. Finally, a feedback session is pretty meaningless if not able to express all group members. After all, it looks now as if we were to some extent we agree. We have for example, decided to get up to next Monday to consider the plan again AG if he makes so much sense. I have noticed one thing that should change what we, and indeed we have provided relatively late again fundamental rights, MMN too late and too little. I would propose that the hour of 9 February, provided on the fundamental rights equal rights need to be amended, in speech and freedom of assembly (or so), because the fundamental rights equal rights seem to me a little less important, and especially the proposed there on "Justice as lawful judge" was coming on Monday already in laserdrome- case before.
On Monday it was my turn with the group lead. I had time to create a custom solution sketch, but read only the solution of the case book and looked up a few things. In the AG, the difference became clear to me - I was prepared for much worse than the two hours before, in which I had created in each case completely defined solutions.
The case was "laserdrome" from the casebook of Degenhart. The solution there is decent but not perfect - I made them really but only in an hour than the other two critical questions were asked.
Next time I make another independent solution map (of course, the given solution-oriented).
We had actually planned for this hour and a feedback session. As an AG member was sick, we have indeed changed shortly, which would also make it not just as a trio. Finally, a feedback session is pretty meaningless if not able to express all group members. After all, it looks now as if we were to some extent we agree. We have for example, decided to get up to next Monday to consider the plan again AG if he makes so much sense. I have noticed one thing that should change what we, and indeed we have provided relatively late again fundamental rights, MMN too late and too little. I would propose that the hour of 9 February, provided on the fundamental rights equal rights need to be amended, in speech and freedom of assembly (or so), because the fundamental rights equal rights seem to me a little less important, and especially the proposed there on "Justice as lawful judge" was coming on Monday already in laserdrome- case before.
Phil Brooks Disposable Syringe
knowledge of the day
The inheritance is a sham as the death certificate. So out of paper and such. Regulated in the 8th Section of the 5th Book Civil Code § § 2353-2370. Note: A look into the law makes it easier to determine the law.
* head -> desk * I had assumed that it was a sham as the warrant ...
Well, 8 Section is not a test substance, nevertheless.
The inheritance is a sham as the death certificate. So out of paper and such. Regulated in the 8th Section of the 5th Book Civil Code § § 2353-2370. Note: A look into the law makes it easier to determine the law.
* head -> desk * I had assumed that it was a sham as the warrant ...
Well, 8 Section is not a test substance, nevertheless.
Sunday, January 11, 2009
Rosalind Hursthouse Virtue Theory
sleepinbeast grumbling about Publishers
My brother gave me for Christmas a coupon for the new edition of Detterbeck "General administrative law with administrative procedural law."
The new edition was announced for January / February and I have extra push my learning plan so that I start administrative law until the end of February. Now I was yesterday in the bookstore to the exact release date to ask. Well, was postponed to the end of March! Very annoying, this
I consider now the development phase, push out something and the end of January first to make the repetition / well AT criminal law. I wanted to anyway sometime in the spring / summer (ie April / May / June) and could do prefer it now. That would fit in that I've signed up for the juxhalber Midterm Exam Criminal Law II. I could do well AT and incidentally also soon learn the exam material. That might be okay.
Nevertheless, it is annoying that the publishers are so unreliable with their information.
This and next week I read "Civil Law" by Medicus. 'm Hard enthusiastic. The style is to read very well. I like that he takes his mind in I-shape and I am grateful that it reflects almost no laws. So I suggest to just, if I do not know what is in a standard, that's much better than it ever get forced to regurgitate.
I am now reading the book only that, within a period of two weeks very comfortable. Later I will again work through thoroughly.
My brother gave me for Christmas a coupon for the new edition of Detterbeck "General administrative law with administrative procedural law."
The new edition was announced for January / February and I have extra push my learning plan so that I start administrative law until the end of February. Now I was yesterday in the bookstore to the exact release date to ask. Well, was postponed to the end of March! Very annoying, this
I consider now the development phase, push out something and the end of January first to make the repetition / well AT criminal law. I wanted to anyway sometime in the spring / summer (ie April / May / June) and could do prefer it now. That would fit in that I've signed up for the juxhalber Midterm Exam Criminal Law II. I could do well AT and incidentally also soon learn the exam material. That might be okay.
Nevertheless, it is annoying that the publishers are so unreliable with their information.
This and next week I read "Civil Law" by Medicus. 'm Hard enthusiastic. The style is to read very well. I like that he takes his mind in I-shape and I am grateful that it reflects almost no laws. So I suggest to just, if I do not know what is in a standard, that's much better than it ever get forced to regurgitate.
I am now reading the book only that, within a period of two weeks very comfortable. Later I will again work through thoroughly.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)