first "real" AG session
end of the hour
The AG-Stizung yesterday quite gone well. We had all felt very well prepared for some reasons we focused on the legal challenge, whereas the focus of the case rather then the temporary injunction was. We have not held out, the case really durchzuprüfen Play in a report style. The case was designed so that he was writing in dre hours dissolves. We started at 18:10, made by bie 19:35 19:45 break and were finished at 21h. We have then discussed other legal issues and some questions from "Test your knowledge" answered.
I felt terribly ill-prepared during the lesson. In my defense I can only mention that I did AVR was the last time in early 2007 and for interim relief before Sunday's nothing. So it was really encouraging to see how far you can get anyway. The "walk", which I for the admissibility / item conditions Judgement thought, had worked and was very helpful to me.
The AG has motivated me to be prepared next time, still significantly better (ie next time, next week I turn to the line anyway) and generally work more / concentrated.
This and That
I have learned that when considering the admissibility / substance of the case conditions is a difference between north and south Germany: In the north you check the action opponents even lower in the south you check him sued first condition of substance.
When testing error of assessment, it is useful as a heading and choose the "misuse of power" (instead of "discretion"), an indication for the corrector that I really only checked for errors and not reliving the whole decision.
to § 4 GO NRW, there is a class city regulation (at least in the prefecture of text NRW state law and the von Hippel-Rehborn included) in all cities in NRW the different types of cities assigned.
had in the penultimate AG-hour we have the "Wedding" or "Prince" theory as a reminder of what is available:
The Prince picks up his bride, with her over the threshold, she lays on the bed, they charged and it changes the content.
-> A disposition is any legal business activity, which removes a right immediately transferred, encumbered or content changes.
In preparing for the AG, I noticed that the system (characteristic of a VA) very similar to the available added:
available: immediate cessation, stress, change or transfer of a right
usually Warning: immediate cessation, stress, change , determination or establishment of a right or refusal of ~
then came yesterday to the four principles of management:
"Why always me?" -> Responsibilities
"There may indeed everyone!" -> Board authority
"We've always done it that way!" -> Commitment of the administration
"Where would we be there?" Legality of the administration (of title and precedence of the Act)
Sodele, now I'm going to the seminar and search for a case for next Monday. Sales law, possibly with a small period problem.
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Monday, October 27, 2008
Male Masterpation Devices
systematic and systematized learning, exam-oriented reading
Yesterday I had my technique to go from general to specific, nor driven a little further. They noted that § § 32-35 of the Criminal Code. I have read only any general comments on the § § in Joecks. Then I read the printed there flowcharts and from a unified scheme (With small deviations for individual § §) tinkered. Against which I then read the rest - all at the first position, then all to action, then all the subjective element, and finally, the respective special issues. To memorize this is because of the risk of a similar inhibition rather poor, but to get an overview of the topic, I found it very useful.
Yesterday evening I received when meeting with friends or a useful piece of information: cases for examination exams have about six to eight months lead time (!). That is, except that you should read anyway alongside a judicial overview or the like, it is useful to briefly flipping through the magazines before the tests of half a year ago, again. As far as the exam plate responsive to current decisions, they will most likely come from the time (well, rarely much later).
I have just written out to me again, where the courts have wichtigstens their seats. Recently, it was again only that such questions are quite like to put the Oral and it's not a thing to learn just by heart.
So
BSG - BGH
Kassel - Karlsruhe
BVerwG - Leipzig
BAG - Erfurt
BFH - Munich
EMRG - Strasbourg
Justice - Luxembourg
This morning I prepare otherwise to the AG today evening. Have just been looked up, as is the opposition proceedings ... the relevant legislation is § 6 AG VwGO NRW, which the opposition procedure is allowed only in educational matters, occupational tests, and the GEZ, I think, welfare (?) decisions. This week AT
Yesterday I had my technique to go from general to specific, nor driven a little further. They noted that § § 32-35 of the Criminal Code. I have read only any general comments on the § § in Joecks. Then I read the printed there flowcharts and from a unified scheme (With small deviations for individual § §) tinkered. Against which I then read the rest - all at the first position, then all to action, then all the subjective element, and finally, the respective special issues. To memorize this is because of the risk of a similar inhibition rather poor, but to get an overview of the topic, I found it very useful.
Yesterday evening I received when meeting with friends or a useful piece of information: cases for examination exams have about six to eight months lead time (!). That is, except that you should read anyway alongside a judicial overview or the like, it is useful to briefly flipping through the magazines before the tests of half a year ago, again. As far as the exam plate responsive to current decisions, they will most likely come from the time (well, rarely much later).
I have just written out to me again, where the courts have wichtigstens their seats. Recently, it was again only that such questions are quite like to put the Oral and it's not a thing to learn just by heart.
So
BSG - BGH
Kassel - Karlsruhe
BVerwG - Leipzig
BAG - Erfurt
BFH - Munich
EMRG - Strasbourg
Justice - Luxembourg
This morning I prepare otherwise to the AG today evening. Have just been looked up, as is the opposition proceedings ... the relevant legislation is § 6 AG VwGO NRW, which the opposition procedure is allowed only in educational matters, occupational tests, and the GEZ, I think, welfare (?) decisions. This week AT
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Defrost Sausage In Microwave
Joecks study commentary, memory aids
criminal turn. By Joecks I'm not quite satisfied, and the controversy are presented, at least in the general section too short. Often no explanation of the different views are given, often only one. It is therefore virtually only pointed out that here is a dispute, and must then essays and can find textbooks on the various views.
most detailed he founded mostly his own view, which I often find yet implausible, either because it provides weak arguments, or because they like to be deemed to constitute "strong words" like "is not clear" as "justification" does. However, I do not regret
the purchase. Since it is a comment, limited the reproduction of the text of the law largely on the footprint of the standards - an increase Punk in my eyes. It is a matter of the textbook reading is no greater waste of time as if the author half the time (like more) cud only the law.
Practically Joecks' Notes to the exam and exam tactics relevance of individual problems.
The book is by the way good, clear, Structured clear, with few repetitions and many references in each place where a problem that affects several standards to be considered in more detail.
*
In the AG, we start on Monday with our first "real" meeting. The group leader had only the default "General Administrative Law" and yesterday sent Preparation Notes:
It would be good if you do decide the admissibility requirements, including definitions of a case before the administrative court look at it, there will be here already one of the focal points.
particular, the legal challenge, as opposed to general performance with respect to the application for interim relief under § 80 Code of Administrative Procedure and the possibility of interim relief under § 123 Code of Administrative Procedure is important. Accordingly, also plays the exact content of the VA concept of a role.
is also to examine the lawful exercise of discretion.
It is my opinion does not necessary to know any court decisions, if you but boredom pushes you can watch flying in descending order of relevance, the following decisions to heart:
VGH Kassel, NVwZ-RR 1996, 654
OVG Münster, NVwZ 1985, 593
BVerwGE 56, 155
is how I had imagined, and I am accordingly satisfied) to
To be able to remember my decision on the merits conditions for the annulment better, I have a walk presented by the city in which I pass places I associative have associated with each test points. Is the first time that I try something and I'm curious to see if it works.
criminal turn. By Joecks I'm not quite satisfied, and the controversy are presented, at least in the general section too short. Often no explanation of the different views are given, often only one. It is therefore virtually only pointed out that here is a dispute, and must then essays and can find textbooks on the various views.
most detailed he founded mostly his own view, which I often find yet implausible, either because it provides weak arguments, or because they like to be deemed to constitute "strong words" like "is not clear" as "justification" does. However, I do not regret
the purchase. Since it is a comment, limited the reproduction of the text of the law largely on the footprint of the standards - an increase Punk in my eyes. It is a matter of the textbook reading is no greater waste of time as if the author half the time (like more) cud only the law.
Practically Joecks' Notes to the exam and exam tactics relevance of individual problems.
The book is by the way good, clear, Structured clear, with few repetitions and many references in each place where a problem that affects several standards to be considered in more detail.
*
In the AG, we start on Monday with our first "real" meeting. The group leader had only the default "General Administrative Law" and yesterday sent Preparation Notes:
It would be good if you do decide the admissibility requirements, including definitions of a case before the administrative court look at it, there will be here already one of the focal points.
particular, the legal challenge, as opposed to general performance with respect to the application for interim relief under § 80 Code of Administrative Procedure and the possibility of interim relief under § 123 Code of Administrative Procedure is important. Accordingly, also plays the exact content of the VA concept of a role.
is also to examine the lawful exercise of discretion.
It is my opinion does not necessary to know any court decisions, if you but boredom pushes you can watch flying in descending order of relevance, the following decisions to heart:
VGH Kassel, NVwZ-RR 1996, 654
OVG Münster, NVwZ 1985, 593
BVerwGE 56, 155
is how I had imagined, and I am accordingly satisfied) to
To be able to remember my decision on the merits conditions for the annulment better, I have a walk presented by the city in which I pass places I associative have associated with each test points. Is the first time that I try something and I'm curious to see if it works.
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
How Does Cervical Mucus Look Before Period
AG Plan Further planning
The meeting on Monday was successful. We have set for about 40 hours issues and set to mid-April, the leadership of the AG sessions. I am on the second turn, with a case to purchase law 3 November. In addition to have (very rough) Topics distribution we have a kind of menu with topics that were not assigned to individual session, and therefore "just" need to be taken into account. To purchase right fit nicely problems from the general law of obligations and of course the implementation of the Consumer Sales Directive and the Consumer Protection Law, as I will in the next few days (on the following evenings ...) times to hunt :-) I am looking forward already .
The meeting on Monday was successful. We have set for about 40 hours issues and set to mid-April, the leadership of the AG sessions. I am on the second turn, with a case to purchase law 3 November. In addition to have (very rough) Topics distribution we have a kind of menu with topics that were not assigned to individual session, and therefore "just" need to be taken into account. To purchase right fit nicely problems from the general law of obligations and of course the implementation of the Consumer Sales Directive and the Consumer Protection Law, as I will in the next few days (on the following evenings ...) times to hunt :-) I am looking forward already .
Monday, October 20, 2008
Congoleum Flooring And Asbestos
Tonight we have another preparatory meeting for the AG: We will create the AG plan.
Therefore I use this morning to add a bit to plan ahead.
I initially had a schedule created for the AG and come to approx. 45 sessions until early November.
The book by ter Haar / Lutz / Wiedenfels ("honors") contains, among other things, an AG plan. This is only for the preparation of a public company. It provides all the material applied in 112 sessions. I'm just me thinking that I will use it for my review. I'm still as accurate - if I search out the topic on an exam and write a solution, or if I take half a day each to repeat the issues again ... I tend to take the former. If I make every week three or four of the units, I still have enough time for the course and exam AG. The only question is whether the time is still sufficient for the books to read that I would like to work through yet, mainly Medicus and Roxin.
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Hid Conversion Street Legal
Obligations
in reading Looschelders' books, I've made notes in the form of questions and answers I typing the passage now. With the various types of contracts I am ready soon.
are on the learning plan something next BGB AT (only things and animals), and then held for the rest of the week to unjust enrichment. On the latter, I am happy because it is one of the issues that I have neglected during the basic studies and the more I would now like to understand it correctly. : D
in reading Looschelders' books, I've made notes in the form of questions and answers I typing the passage now. With the various types of contracts I am ready soon.
are on the learning plan something next BGB AT (only things and animals), and then held for the rest of the week to unjust enrichment. On the latter, I am happy because it is one of the issues that I have neglected during the basic studies and the more I would now like to understand it correctly. : D
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Can Stomach Ache Indicate Kidney Problems
European Law
I stand by my positive assessment of Hook's "European law" book. Waived his right to legal in Textbooks, popular playback of standard texts. In between, there are summaries and questions for further thought, I like that.
Here I found a meeting:
http://www.jurawelt.com/literatur/europarecht/282842
And the author:
Hakenberg
Born in 1955, studied law in Regensburg and Geneva (1974-1979), first state law examination (1979), post-graduate studies in Community law at the College of Europe in Bruges (1979-1980), lawyer in Regensburg (1980-1983), Doctor of Laws (1982); Second State Examination (1983); Lawyer in Munich and Paris (1983-1989); Official at the European Court of Justice (1990-2005), Legal Officer at the Court of European Communities (Chambers of Judge Jann, 1995-2005), taught at several universities in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Russia, Honorary Fellow, University of Saarland (since 1999); various member legal committees, groups and committees, and numerous publications on Community law and Community law procedure, Chancellor of the Court of the Civil Service since 30 November 2005.
Source: http://curia.europa.eu/de/instit/presentationfr/index_tfp.htm
I stand by my positive assessment of Hook's "European law" book. Waived his right to legal in Textbooks, popular playback of standard texts. In between, there are summaries and questions for further thought, I like that.
Here I found a meeting:
http://www.jurawelt.com/literatur/europarecht/282842
And the author:
Hakenberg
Born in 1955, studied law in Regensburg and Geneva (1974-1979), first state law examination (1979), post-graduate studies in Community law at the College of Europe in Bruges (1979-1980), lawyer in Regensburg (1980-1983), Doctor of Laws (1982); Second State Examination (1983); Lawyer in Munich and Paris (1983-1989); Official at the European Court of Justice (1990-2005), Legal Officer at the Court of European Communities (Chambers of Judge Jann, 1995-2005), taught at several universities in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Russia, Honorary Fellow, University of Saarland (since 1999); various member legal committees, groups and committees, and numerous publications on Community law and Community law procedure, Chancellor of the Court of the Civil Service since 30 November 2005.
Source: http://curia.europa.eu/de/instit/presentationfr/index_tfp.htm
Discounts On Lindberg Frames
knowledge of the day
Yesterday I I put a stack of books on European law on loan, which I have now looked at. I opted for two books:
Hakenberg, "European Law", 4th Edition 2007
and
Volker Epping / Sebastian Lenz, "Fallrepetitorium European Law", 1 Edition 2005
Hakenberg writes MMN bad German, the book can be read relatively quickly but still - and it has only about 200 pages. I like the content that a focus on the policies of the EC.
you I owe the knowledge of the day: I've finally figured why it early 50's just gave the ECSC! Coal and steel -> Armor - Coal and Steel Community -> no armor against participating States. Aaaah! * Head-> table *
Yesterday I I put a stack of books on European law on loan, which I have now looked at. I opted for two books:
Hakenberg, "European Law", 4th Edition 2007
and
Volker Epping / Sebastian Lenz, "Fallrepetitorium European Law", 1 Edition 2005
Hakenberg writes MMN bad German, the book can be read relatively quickly but still - and it has only about 200 pages. I like the content that a focus on the policies of the EC.
you I owe the knowledge of the day: I've finally figured why it early 50's just gave the ECSC! Coal and steel -> Armor - Coal and Steel Community -> no armor against participating States. Aaaah! * Head-> table *
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)