Greeting In Telephone Sales

AG, Exam Course, Crash Course, current case law

D. The AG

Parallel to the preparation alone I founded with three friends a corporation. We met a year once a week for four hours (including short break). In turn brought one of us a great case to a predetermined topic (eg "EBV" or "murder / manslaughter") with. The others had three each for about one half to one hour to each site to customize a solution for sketch. The AG-manager of the week took advantage of this quiet working mostly to their solution yet once or go read something else. Then we solved the case, as in an oral examination. That is, the AG-head turn took us and we checked in, if possible style advice.

The AG-plan we had previously determined jointly. The cases should come alternately from the civil law and Ö-Recht/Strafrecht (ratio 2:1:1). Because of the importance of the different areas of law, the requirements were sometimes quite detailed ("EBV", "freedom of expression and association") and sometimes rather coarse ("Labour", "Construction Law").

a special challenge for us was that we are all different prepared for the exam: one with inhibitors, a small group at AS and one at Unirep. For me it was easiest, I had completely after six months the AG material once through. In retrospect it would have been useful to ensure, even more important that we treat in the group only matters that all have ever had in their own preparation. This is particularly true for the secondary areas, which are banished to the best end of the AG Plan.
was the other hand, the heterogeneous composition of the AG also an advantage because we could read from various sources, the best explanations and aphorisms.

Overall, the AG was a great addition . I can each and every one a try, to seek also a learning group, no matter how otherwise prepared. You learn a lot in conversation with others, exercise, get bug that you would otherwise be made on the exam - and besides it's also really fun! We had in any case always a good laugh.



E. The Klausurenkurs

After nearly six months I began to write exams. This is important is well known. This (first) about six months after the exam to begin is also useful, because then you have already a fund of knowledge with which you can battle through a solution.

I have written and around 30 exams given, both in Unirep-course exam as well as inhibitors, where at that time in Munster, the retreat meetings (with Jan Jacob and Christian Pope) were very, very good. I have also made further examinations solution sketches. This is useful when one has the impression that one has to write a problem with the timing. Solution with sketches can practice good to see the focus of a retreat to structure a case solution to clean and to repeat both definitions as well as military items. The time you save, because you create drafted solutions, you can spend on this, Read problems that could not answer in the exam.

yes I've written quite a few exams and is considering a couple of times, whether it would have been better to write more. Most likely it would have presumably paid to write such exams, which are very queried many familiar problems in a relatively short time. For in such exams, one can check, whether one just these problems "in the pan" and has for example in a position to build the nested test of a cost decision in POR sovereign. Who is already prepared for a while again exam, should be able to recognize such facts on exams.



F. However, even for commercial Rep: The Crash Course

After independent over a year of preparation, I felt like I sprinkle We'd also leave. I also found it reassuring to get presents from a professional, which would in any case belong to the relevant material. Since I was focused, the AS-Crahskurs site too much on current case law, I booked the crash course with inhibitors, the teachers I had heard, thanks to my friends more (mostly positive).

has ultimately been worth about the price in half. The material on criminal law, employment law, Code of Civil Procedure and Ö-law were very useful for me. Labor Code of Civil Procedure and I had also neglected until then rather because I had not found any book that gave me the fabric in the desired compressed size of me, here I have two very nice notes of the course brings in the exam exams. Otherwise, the course looked really calm above all, hardly something new, so I did nothing substantial had overlooked.



G. Current law

by the Audit Office Hamm had there been an information event, an indication that it would last about five to eight months to create a retreat. Since exams often on current legal Developments were based, one is well advised to observe this phase in the case law and the education journals of vigilance.

The last months before the exams, I spent so others telling me to get an overview of the current law. For that I evaluated the verdict meetings several training journals for 2009 (on a written exam date February 2010). Judgments that have been discussed several times, or were relevant to my exam because their subject matter came to my reading list. Overall, I read so within three weeks about 150 Judgement meetings.

Although none of these judgments drankam on the exam, this study was still useful, because in this way I repeated just before the exams again the different areas and got a pretty good feel for what moves the world of legal straight. Then there was the pleasant, good conscience, I must in any event not blame the exam if current law would mess out. And yes, we all know: A good conscience is a soft pillow.