systematic and systematized learning, exam-oriented reading
Yesterday I had my technique to go from general to specific, nor driven a little further. They noted that § § 32-35 of the Criminal Code. I have read only any general comments on the § § in Joecks. Then I read the printed there flowcharts and from a unified scheme (With small deviations for individual § §) tinkered. Against which I then read the rest - all at the first position, then all to action, then all the subjective element, and finally, the respective special issues. To memorize this is because of the risk of a similar inhibition rather poor, but to get an overview of the topic, I found it very useful.
Yesterday evening I received when meeting with friends or a useful piece of information: cases for examination exams have about six to eight months lead time (!). That is, except that you should read anyway alongside a judicial overview or the like, it is useful to briefly flipping through the magazines before the tests of half a year ago, again. As far as the exam plate responsive to current decisions, they will most likely come from the time (well, rarely much later).
I have just written out to me again, where the courts have wichtigstens their seats. Recently, it was again only that such questions are quite like to put the Oral and it's not a thing to learn just by heart.
So
BSG - BGH
Kassel - Karlsruhe
BVerwG - Leipzig
BAG - Erfurt
BFH - Munich
EMRG - Strasbourg
Justice - Luxembourg
This morning I prepare otherwise to the AG today evening. Have just been looked up, as is the opposition proceedings ... the relevant legislation is § 6 AG VwGO NRW, which the opposition procedure is allowed only in educational matters, occupational tests, and the GEZ, I think, welfare (?) decisions. This week AT
0 comments:
Post a Comment